Glock Pro Forums banner
21 - 40 of 57 Posts
5 stovepipes in 10,000 rounds on the same spring?

That's a 0.0005 failure rate. That is WAY better than any military requirements. Heck, in 2006, 26% of US military users reported a failure during combat with their M9.

I personally have never once had a stoppage with any of my glocks, nor seen one, and I also have around 10,000 rounds down range. I don't doubt what you say, I just have personally never witnessed it. And given what you say, that failure rate seems awfully low to call a "serious reliability issue."
Don't twist what I said to make it something else. First this:

"Beretta has set an unprecedented record for reliability with the M9 pistol... The average reliability of all M9 pistols tested at Beretta U.S.A. is 17,500 rounds without a stoppage. During one test of twelve pistols, fired at Beretta U.S.A. under Army supervision, Beretta-made M9 pistols shot 168,000 rounds without a single malfunction."
-- Gabriele de Plano, Vice President of Military Marketing & Sales for Beretta U.S.A. (as quoted by AmmmoLand.com)

I am not touting Barettas. I seldom shoot mine. I was just comparing reliability. I only mentioned the usage on my RSA because someone (wrongfully) suggested that Glocks eject poorly because the RSA is strong to improve reliability. I just said you assume mine is weaker since it at twice the life Glock recommends, but it still ejects poorly.

There is no better Glock user than Cohland right on this forum. Yet he has written at length about poor ejection and even has a list of things to go thru if you have a problem. It's worth doing, but I have 5 Glocks that eject poorly OOB. They supposedly are not damaged or worn out.

Someone likened it to random Silverado issues. It's more like the Chevrolet ignition key issue. It is not random, unpredictable software or hardware failure. It is a systematic designed in problem well known to manufacturer and unaddressed for a long period while production continues. Like it or not, at an indoor, baffled range my ejected casings do not hit the baffle that is less than a foot away if I move close to it. Say what you wish, but this is not right.
 
Discussion starter · #23 ·
The good folks at Glockmeister took a look at my G19 g4 today and could find nothing wrong. They offered to replace the ejector for cost but I feel it is a Glock warranty issue. I was told to talk to Glock and see what they have to say. No explaination was given for poor ejection and rounds occasionaly hitting me in the face.
 
Bailey, when you contacted Glock about this problem what did they have to say?
 
Don't twist what I said to make it something else. First this:

"Beretta has set an unprecedented record for reliability with the M9 pistol... The average reliability of all M9 pistols tested at Beretta U.S.A. is 17,500 rounds without a stoppage. During one test of twelve pistols, fired at Beretta U.S.A. under Army supervision, Beretta-made M9 pistols shot 168,000 rounds without a single malfunction."
-- Gabriele de Plano, Vice President of Military Marketing & Sales for Beretta U.S.A. (as quoted by AmmmoLand.com)

I am not touting Barettas. I seldom shoot mine. I was just comparing reliability. I only mentioned the usage on my RSA because someone (wrongfully) suggested that Glocks eject poorly because the RSA is strong to improve reliability. I just said you assume mine is weaker since it at twice the life Glock recommends, but it still ejects poorly.

There is no better Glock user than Cohland right on this forum. Yet he has written at length about poor ejection and even has a list of things to go thru if you have a problem. It's worth doing, but I have 5 Glocks that eject poorly OOB. They supposedly are not damaged or worn out.

Someone likened it to random Silverado issues. It's more like the Chevrolet ignition key issue. It is not random, unpredictable software or hardware failure. It is a systematic designed in problem well known to manufacturer and unaddressed for a long period while production continues. Like it or not, at an indoor, baffled range my ejected casings do not hit the baffle that is less than a foot away if I move close to it. Say what you wish, but this is not right.
I'm sorry Bailey, I don't know you from Adam and only have what is apparently a very frustrated rant on an internet board to go by but what you're saying isn't completely adding up to me.

You own 5 Gen4 9mm Glocks and they ALL have the same weak ejection problem. The first Glock was purchased 18 months ago and you shoot 6 days a week, yet you kept buying more even though Glock has refused and/or failed to fix your problem (on every gun or any gun along the way)?

In the process of continuing to buy guns, where not one of them works correctly, you spent $3,500 at the "best discount pricing." Unfortunately, even at full retail pricing the 5 guns + slide don't add up to $3k. At GSSF pricing they would have been around $2,500. I don't know if it's a complete slide or bare but still, not that big a difference.

The G34 already has over 10,000 rounds through it. You don't mention how many rounds through the others but if you're shooting 6 days a week that's a massive amount of money spent on ammo not to mention the time put in every week. If I were spending that much time and money every week - Not only would Glock know me by name but so would the district LE rep (doesn't matter if you're LE or not if you're shooting that much). I would have made a lot of noise everywhere that someone who could actually solve my problem would be (calling Glock, talking to the closest LE/blue box distributor, talking to armorers/gunsmiths). If I had that much time and money to spend on shooting I would be willing to invest a lot of it into finding the person who would make sure my equipment ran perfect. You may feel that you have, but you haven't shared that specifically and we're talking about a company who is known for resolving people's issues.

You're story and situation maybe legit because it's not all here and I want to recognize that. But what is here isn't adding up for me and perhaps that's just your frustration getting into the mix. BTW - I also own 5 Gen4 9mm along with older versions (I don't shoot anywhere near as many rounds as you do). I was just in the armorer's class with a Glock employed instructor and over 25 law enforcement armorers (some new but a lot of re-certs) and other than making sure the most current version of the extractor was in the gun, the ejector wasn't talked about as a current problem.

I honestly hope you get resolution. If you were in my part of Texas I would assist you myself. If you're near Lexington, Lousiville or Florence there are LE distributors there. Otherwise there are a lot of blue box retailers in KY, they will have the best Glock relationship. As much as you are shooting, I would expect you would run into a lot of folks who know someone at Glock that can help also. If you're too fed up, even though your guns have a LOT of use and exhibiting failures, I would consider buying them. Because I believe the problems can be resolved.
 
Look MtStream you seem to be suggesting that I am fudging on facts here. I've no reason to do that. I'm not on a rant. I'm only explaining the current position I find with Glock.

I do shoot 6 days a week. My wife also shoots 4-5 of those days. I alone shoot a minimum of 100 rounds a day at a nearby indoor range and I go to an outdoor gun club to which I belong once or twice a week (and do not go to the indoor range those days) and usually shoot at least 300 rounds while I'm there (it is not close). The reason I know that is that I run through a series of drills on which I track times to try to improve my ability. Heck, in a two-hour lesson recently I shot 600 rounds and 300 more in a followup not to mention the rounds I shot later to practice what I was taught. I also shoot IDPA at an indoor club once per week at about 100 rounds and once per month outdoors at about 125 rounds. So putting 10K rounds on the G34 is easy and I can prove my purchases of Hornady bullets from MidwayUSA and Montana Gold from them. Obviously I can't prove I shot all of them. You'll just have to believe that I have no reason store up bullets. Hell, I wish I did have some stored up. Think I don't have a problem getting enough powder? I'm rotating 5 powders now and have loaded 8 different ones over the past few months because that's what I can get. And yes, I have shot some factory rounds as well. I am an experienced reloader, not a dumb bo.

As far as gun purchases and money...the going price here for a commercial Glock here is 540 (OK,OK 539) + 6% tax. I cannot buy at LE prices. I did buy my 34 on a GSSF coupon for 485 plus tax + FFL because out of state was still cheaper than in state. The OEM Glock slide I bought from One Source Tactical with a machined in Trijicon RMR for $1000. You can argue that this wasn't to Glock, but I never would have bought it unless I had Glocks so I count it. All that adds up to $3799. Thank you very much.

Now it's nice that you offer to help out if I was near you. I'd probably be glad to see what you could suggest. However, surely you are aware of all the internet chatter and UTube videos related to these ejection issues. Heck it's an open secret. Right here on the forum as I mentioned, Cohland has repeatedly written on these issues. He certainly seems to be a rational, well mannered guy who is trying to address the problems rationally. I guess my question would be, why is it necessary that he be experimenting with solutions? He clearly sees problems. Where is Glock on these things?

On Glock, I am an armorer (for whatever that's worth). I deliberately went to a class in Smyrna which is not particularly close to me, but not an impossible distance. The class and instructor were good. I wasn't there to show my butt so I didn't bring up my issues in class. That would have been ridiculous. I did talk to the instructor individually about my problem ( I did not have the 34 at that time). He told me rather bluntly that Glock had no ejection issues other than some early Gen 4 problems that had been addressed. I asked him as nicely as I can speak why the internet is filled with claims of problems. He told me (again rather bluntly) that on inspection of incoming warranty issues the major finding is user error or ammunition issues. It was a short conversation because of time constraints and his obvious desire to end it. Again it wasn't my desire to argue, just to get some information. The information I got was there are not any problems.

Am I the only one with a problem? I don't think so based on what I see on line (and no one is more critical of internet information than I am) and my knowledge of local issues. Hell, my wife jumped me the other day about her 26 hitting her in the nose with ejections. I took it out couldn't get it to eject far enough to hit me in the face. Maybe my arms are longer than hers. A local shooter (a darn good one) contacted me this past weekend with a request for an ejector if I had one (which I didn't). The issue was related to some failures he was having and trying fix (G34).

So I'm not ranting. I'm not crazy. I am an engineer who is used to problem solving. I don't expect perfection all the time. It's Glock Perfection isn't it? That is not my tagline. I'd just like to see it sometimes. Piss on me if you must, but I'm just saying....
 
Sorry for your troubles Bailey, but I don't think anyone's trying to bash you here. I had a small issue with my G30 when I first bought it and everyone here did everything they could to give me tips. MtStream has a decent point though. Why would you keep buying Glocks if you haven't resolved the issues with the first one? It IS like buying a brand of vehicle and the first one is a lemon, so you buy another... and another... and another. A Beretta may just be the brand for you. Nothing wrong with that. As far as the pricing thing goes, I don't think anyone said that you were bending the truth. You just weren't up front about the RMR.
 
Also, an up close picture that's good and clear will help wonders when you can get one posted. It's almost the next best thing to actually sending someone your extractor and ejector. I am new to Glock. I am used to the way my other pistols throw brass. So, I'm sure we can all relate to how each different brand takes a little getting accustomed to. But if yours just barely ejects, I can understand your frustration.
 
FWIW, I have a faulty ignition switch and most of the "other" issues Silverado has and refuse to fix at the production level.


I had a Ford before this and it had it's own quirks, (I replaced the rod that runs down the steering column to activate the ignition contacts from the actual key ignition at least 6 times in the 10 years I owned that truck), would I buy another Ford ?

Sure !

I am of the belief that anything can be fixed, but, that is what I do for a living, so I may be a bit biased on this topic.
 
The good folks at Glockmeister took a look at my G19 g4 today and could find nothing wrong. They offered to replace the ejector for cost but I feel it is a Glock warranty issue. I was told to talk to Glock and see what they have to say. No explaination was given for poor ejection and rounds occasionaly hitting me in the face.
I would definitely, at least, call Glock. They may just send you the new part. If they did, I'm sure that it would be on the free.
 
...I'm getting fed up with Glock's ejection problems and just about to jump ship. I have 5 Glocks all Gen 4...a 26, 19, two 17's and an extra Glock slide for one of those, and a 34. The oldest (a 17) is about 18 months old and the newest ( the 19) about 3 months. Every single one of those barely ejects a casing. I catch my casings on a net when shooting outside. If I stand on the edge of the net, some casings miss the net at my feet. They are falling straight down from the ejection port.

I am not a weakling who allows uninhibited muzzle flip. I am not an occasional shooter. I shoot 6 days a week routinely. I shoot both factory ammo and reloaded ammo of both high and low PF. I shoot at least 5 different powders (by necessity) and 115 and 124 grain FMJ round nose bullets from brand name manufacturers (mostly Montana Gold, but not all). It makes absolutely no difference. The casing barely escape the gun. Other than sights, my guns are (until now) stock. I have Lone Wolf extractor for my 34 on the truck now so we will see what happens....
I've been thinking about your post for a few days, wondering what could be going wrong here that's causing your frustration. Can't say I really have an answer. Since it seems that you've read earlier posts on the topic, I'll assume that your guns have the current parts (especially the ejectors), and that they all have enough rounds through them to be considered "broken in", so that the coating is worn on the top and bottom of the extractors.

One thing I will suggest: if your Lone Wolf extractor does make a difference for you, the first thing I would do is to really scrub the claw of your other extractors with a wire brush, to make sure that they're as tidy as a new one. If you shoot a lot (and you do...), carbon buildup on the extractor might be a factor here. That's really grasping for straws, isn't it?

Oh, one other idea: if you've taken the guns apart, be sure to get the EDP assembly inserted so that the metal end is touching the extractor. If you reverse them and put the polymer Spring-Loaded Bearing against the extractor they really won't work well at all. Don't laugh, I've seen this happen.



I wonder if maybe the Glock extractor claw is shallow compared to other makes..hmmm...something for me to look at. I'll do that later today and will come back to this thread with the results. I'll compare the claw depth of the standard 9mm Glock LCI extractor, the non-LCI extractor (I think I have one), the Lone Wolf Extractor, and extractors from a 1911, a Beretta 92Fs, and a CZ 75 Shadow. A little data might tell us something.

For ammo I shoot mainly competition reloads (147-grain Montana Gold bullets at about 880 fps), some Winchester NATO, some Winchester White Box, Fiocchi, Federal, and Magtech (whatever is available through retailers), probably similar to what you're using. Right now I'm shooting a G34 frequently, a G19 once a month or so, and a G17 when I realize I haven't fired it for a few months. Most of my Glock time is spent with the G34 in USPSA matches. They all exhibit the same 100% reliability in cycling and ejection.

Personally, I don't pay a lot of attention to where the empties go unless they are jamming or hitting me in the face. I did have some Brass-To-Face (BTF) problems a long time ago, but they were cured by the new 30274 ejector. Generally my brass is off to the right rear, about 2-3 feet if I recall correctly. The last time I had a stovepipe jam in a Glock was literally years ago, when I had just acquired my first one, a Gen4 G17. In my case, it was purely a skill problem, I didn't know how to hold ANY pistol properly.

My Beretta is a 92FS, and although I don't know where the empties go, I do know that I don't have problems with it, but that is a heavier gun, really designed to be able to function reliably with very little training. One thing that I've learned that separates the Beretta from some other makes is that it seems to fit small hands well, with a nice short reach to the trigger. This thought takes me off on a tangent, so I need to ask: do Glocks fit your hands well, and since you're using all Gen4 guns, what backstraps (if any) are you using? Maybe we've got a fit problem that is contributing to a handling problem. Just asking, fishing around here, trying to come up with ideas.

I wonder, have you had a friend shoot your Glocks and have the same kind of problems? That might tell you something, at least it would rule out operator error.

So, stay tuned for a update on the extractor claw depth, that might be significant or it might not, at least I'll post up a little data for further consideration.

And please try to hang in there with your Glocks a little longer, for no reason other than to try out a few ideas and see if the dialog brings forth other suggestions. We might just make some progress!

Chris
 

Attachments

...I wonder if maybe the Glock extractor claw is shallow compared to other makes..hmmm...something for me to look at. I'll do that later today and will come back to this thread with the results. I'll compare the claw depth of the standard 9mm Glock LCI extractor, the non-LCI extractor (I think I have one), the Lone Wolf Extractor, and extractors from a 1911, a Beretta 92Fs, and a CZ 75 Shadow. A little data might tell us something....
..and it might not.

In any case, to avoid a big old thread hijacking, here's a new thread on the topic of the extractor claw gap for 9mm: http://glock.pro/glock-tech-warranty/9090-some-9mm-extractor-observations.html#post99746

Chris
 
I would suggest trying a NON- LCI Spring Loaded Bearing instead of the LCI one.

After trying several extractors ( one by the guys at a GSSF Match) and a new plunger spring, nothing changed.
A 30274 ejector did help a lot but not 100%
The above SLB fixed everything and after several 1,000's of rds. is still working great.
 
I would suggest trying a NON- LCI Spring Loaded Bearing instead of the LCI one.

After trying several extractors ( one by the guys at a GSSF Match) and a new plunger spring, nothing changed.
A 30274 ejector did help a lot but not 100%
The above SLB fixed everything and after several 1,000's of rds. is still working great.
That's a good suggestion, I've tried it before and although it didn't work for me under the circumstances, it might make a difference. This part, number 1176, is quite a bit thicker at the top so it will pre-load the EDP spring more, in effect making the EDP spring stronger.

It's certainly not too expensive to try out, anyway.

Chris
 
Thanks for the suggestions. Yes I have the EDP in correctly. I don't fault you for asking, you don't know me from Adam. But, in fact, I am pretty knowledgable about the way a Glock goes together.

I use both the medium and large back straps. The G34 has the medium installed. The grip is too small without a bs. I also have Dawson grip tape on the 34 mainly because it gives a better grip in our summer humidity and heat. There is no difference in function outdoors or in the indoor air conditioned range.

I'm a decent not great competition shooter. I do not have a namby bamby grip. I take some lessons from and shoot with some excellent (expert and master) shooters. They all check out your grip first and foremost and no one has found fault with mine.

Extractor wear...yes mine are worn to silver metal but not to the extent that you sanded yours. Yes, I clean both slide channels regularly and carbon buildup in the extractor/firing pin safety area gets bad fast. I clean the hook with a brass bush every other day. Carbon on the hook is not the problem. I run Winchester White Box, Federal, Blazer, and PMC factory ammo on no specific schedule but several times per month. No difference from my reloads. I regularly reload 124 Montana Golds to a mid 130's PF so that I easily (hopefully) pass any IDPA PF check that might come up.

I run the LCI extractors that came in my guns. I have made zero changes to the guns except sights except for 26 which is my wife's gun and not of particular interest to me. I did put a Glock Triggers carry trigger on her 26. That trigger is little more than a 25 cent trigger job for $150. it is all OEM parts. I took it out because the factory is better in both our opinions. Anybody want it?

It's my IDPA night so I need to run. Hopefully I have answered some of your questions. My Lone Wolf extractor should be in the mailbox and I'll test it in the morning and let you know. I hope it works but I'll be disappointed in Glock if it does.
 
Thanks for the suggestions. Yes I have the EDP in correctly. I don't fault you for asking, you don't know me from Adam. But, in fact, I am pretty knowledgable about the way a Glock goes together.
I should have mentioned what you noted, that I don't know anything about your experience with guns. I'm glad you didn't take offense!

I use both the medium and large back straps. The G34 has the medium installed. The grip is too small without a bs. I also have Dawson grip tape on the 34 mainly because it gives a better grip in our summer humidity and heat. There is no difference in function outdoors or in the indoor air conditioned range.

I'm a decent not great competition shooter. I do not have a namby bamby grip. I take some lessons from and shoot with some excellent (expert and master) shooters. They all check out your grip first and foremost and no one has found fault with mine.
OK, check, grip is OK. How about your forearms, are you really bracing the gun? I'm able to hold my grip correctly and yet induce a malfunction by letting my arms absorb too much recoil, instead of resisting it. I know you're experienced, but I'm fishing here, admittedly.

How about other shooters, do they have the same kind of problems with yours Glocks and ammo?

Extractor wear...yes mine are worn to silver metal but not to the extent that you sanded yours. Yes, I clean both slide channels regularly and carbon buildup in the extractor/firing pin safety area gets bad fast. I clean the hook with a brass bush every other day. Carbon on the hook is not the problem. I run Winchester White Box, Federal, Blazer, and PMC factory ammo on no specific schedule but several times per month. No difference from my reloads. I regularly reload 124 Montana Golds to a mid 130's PF so that I easily (hopefully) pass any IDPA PF check that might come up.
You're doing a better job than I am of keeping the extractor clear, so that's off the list. Hey, it was worth a try, right?

I run the LCI extractors that came in my guns. I have made zero changes to the guns except sights except for 26 which is my wife's gun and not of particular interest to me. ...
OK, no changes. Good. Good for troubleshooting, anyway.

It's my IDPA night so I need to run. Hopefully I have answered some of your questions. My Lone Wolf extractor should be in the mailbox and I'll test it in the morning and let you know. I hope it works but I'll be disappointed in Glock if it does.
Yes, thanks, you did answer the questions, I appreciate the reply. It will be interesting to see if the Lone Wolf extractor does make a difference, and note that another member suggested trying a non-LCI spring-loaded bearing. That might have an effect as well.

Chris
 
Discussion starter · #37 ·
My call to Glock yesterday was not very posative. After explaining the symptoms the person on the other end of the phone said to wait until it FTE again and then send it in. He said he was not aware of other people having the same problems. IMO I was stonewalled. Does anyone know the name of the go-to person at Glock?
 
My call to Glock yesterday was not very posative. After explaining the symptoms the person on the other end of the phone said to wait until it FTE again and then send it in. He said he was not aware of other people having the same problems. IMO I was stonewalled. Does anyone know the name of the go-to person at Glock?
Some of the common causes that cause erratic ejections including stove pipes are a dirty chamber, dirty gun or improperly lubed gun. The dirty chamber is an odd one to catch - the chamber is slightly larger than the barrel so the 9mm brush isn't a tight fit there. Sometimes there's buildup where the barrel and chamber meet and the round doesn't seat all the way in. A problem can be troubleshot for awhile without solution then something causes whatever was in that little corner of the chamber to finally fall out and the problem goes away without explanation. Wouldn't surprise me if a Glock tech wants to see a gun immediately after the problem before anything can change. Otherwise he may not be able to replicate an issue . . . maybe. BTW - if you don't give the chamber extra attention, hit it with the brush just before it enters the barrel real good. Sometimes I'll use a .40 cal brush in the chamber of a barrel that's been shooting dirty ammo like Wolf. Don't force it into the barrel where it can get stuck, just the chamber.

Glockmeister had said they'd replace the ejector at cost - I don't know what they quoted you but it's a $5 part that you already know how to replace from your detailed strip. I understand the "principle of the matter" related to warranty, but $5 may be a cheap way to avoid further frustration. If it doesn't solve it, you haven't lost much and might keep a few hairs on your head in exchange :D

One thing that's rarely talked about enough when troubleshooting are magazines. Are you having issues with all of your magazines? It's a good habit to mark magazines. There's a ton of "I never would have thunk it" issues that end up being exposed by a mag problem.
 
Discussion starter · #40 · (Edited)
^
Good input, thanks.

Glockmeister did a thorough check out of the gun, including disassemnly of all three mags. If they thought it was not clean enough they would have mentioned it. They quoted me a price of $15 for the extractor but could not qurantee that was the problem.

I'd love to chalk it up to a bad batch of ammo but research has shown to many other people having the same problems.
 
21 - 40 of 57 Posts