i love the g30sf . i would consider it a compact . to me it`s damm near like g23 but a lil bit thicker.
Should Glock classify the G30 as a compact or subcompact?
It's longer in the slide and grip than the other subcompacts. Really, it doesn't fit with the compacts either. The slide and grip are shorter than the other compacts. Should it have it's own class like the G36?
I chose "compact" because I think it's too big to be considered a sub. I'm glad Glock didn't shorten the slide to make it more like a sub. Really, I think the G30/30SF is perfect just the way it is.
I chose "compact" because I think it's too big to be considered a sub. I'm glad Glock didn't shorten the slide to make it more like a sub. Really, I think the G30/30SF is perfect just the way it is.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
New 30 SF Sub-Compact...
Let us cut off 1/2" and we will then almost have our New Sub-Compact!
Let us cut off 1/2" and we will then almost have our New Sub-Compact!
Heresy
Let us cut off 1/2" and we will then almost have our New Sub-Compact!
I imagine it would be like shooting a G39...snappy!
i always though it was strange of glock to classify the chunky G29/30 pistols as "sub-compacts" as well, but i understand their reasoning behind it.
their "compacts", like the g19/23, have 4 inch barrels. (or 4.02" to be exact)
all their "subcompact" models have sub-4inch barrels (G26/27 are 3.46", and the G29/30 are 3.78")
their "compacts", like the g19/23, have 4 inch barrels. (or 4.02" to be exact)
all their "subcompact" models have sub-4inch barrels (G26/27 are 3.46", and the G29/30 are 3.78")
2
here's a couple pics of g30 and a sig 220c3-sss/compact for comparison and i carry the 30.
![]()
![]()
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
