I was reading a few blogs this weekend from some competitive shooters and saw a discussion on several of them concerning the possible creation of a new division/classification above master in IDPA. The general theme is that this classification would be attainable only through winning sanctioned major matches at the master level. The idea is that it would soon move the professional shooters into a class of their own.
I got to thinking about applying this idea to GSSF, and was wondering what the opinions of GSSF shooters on the matter would be.
GSSF currently promotes amateurs to master after three wins. In studying the results of matches, it looks like scores in the high sixties to low seventies typically win the amateur civilian, guardian and competition divisions with an occasional shooter sometimes blowing that out of the water. Looking at the master scores, it looks like scores down in the forties are winning.
So, win three matches, and all of a sudden you are up against the likes of Sevigney, David Knight, etc.
I personally would like to see a higher division than master attainable through wins that would move those uber-class shooters into their own division.
What say you?
I got to thinking about applying this idea to GSSF, and was wondering what the opinions of GSSF shooters on the matter would be.
GSSF currently promotes amateurs to master after three wins. In studying the results of matches, it looks like scores in the high sixties to low seventies typically win the amateur civilian, guardian and competition divisions with an occasional shooter sometimes blowing that out of the water. Looking at the master scores, it looks like scores down in the forties are winning.
So, win three matches, and all of a sudden you are up against the likes of Sevigney, David Knight, etc.
I personally would like to see a higher division than master attainable through wins that would move those uber-class shooters into their own division.
What say you?